KLINGER’S THEORY (of Planer Forces)
The following is a list of claims used to define Klinger’s Theory of Planer Forces.
1. The Universe is formed and influenced by planer forces.
2. Our visible Universe makes up an octave of dimensions. Every octave completes a cycle and contains everything visible in our night sky. The octave contains the border of our universe down to the building blocks we theorize as atoms (three dimensional matter).
3. All matter manifests into all dimensions and does so in the shape of a Fibonacci helix. It is natures drill bit.
a. Three dimensional matter manifests in the fourth dimension.
i. Creates Fibonacci Helix we see with plants and animals.
b. Fourth dimensional matter (Sun and Planets) manifests in the fifth dimension as our solar system, and (at the right speed) can be seen as a Fibonacci helix.
c. Fifth dimensional (Stars collating) manifests in the sixth dimension as a galaxy in the shape of a Fibonacci helix.
d. Sixth dimensional (Galaxies) manifests in the seventh dimension as the Universe in the shape of a Fibonacci helix.
1. We cannot see this because we are inside of the singularity. This means the sixth dimension is the limit of our conscious awareness.
2. We would have to be outside of the singularity in order to see the Fibonacci helix made by the Universe. But, we would then be in a different octave, and still unable to see the Universe’s helix from our perspective.
e. The eighth dimension is the same as the first, just like an octave scale of music.
4. Time is not the fourth dimension. Time is a product of the fourth dimension.
a. The first three dimensions do not experience time as we do in the fourth; therefore, they are seen as a solid.
b. All of the “time” experienced in the fourth dimension is seen as an instant in the fifth, sixth and seventh. The fourth dimension is seen as a solid from the sixth dimension.
c. Three dimensional matter appears in the fourth dimension, and creates a wave that is squeezed (pinched flat) by the fifth dimension. This becomes our solar plane created by the seam between opposing planer forces closing in on the appearing star. The smashed wave traps the three dimensional debris and creates a pause for the matter to experience itself.
5. Gravity, as currently defined (attraction of mass), is a false interpretation of reality. Planer forces are responsible for all motion in our Universe.
a. Gravity on our earth is a centrifugal force projected onto the earth’s surface from its rotation (orbit) around the Sun.
i. The earth is the wall of a centrifuge.
ii. Time (product of fourth dimension) is responsible for us seeing this orbit as lengthy but it happens in an instant, everywhere but here.
6. Three dimensional conscious matter travels (cycles) from the fourth to the sixth dimensions.
a. The three dimensional material cycles in the fourth.
b. Consciousness travels to the sixth dimension to complete its cycle.
i. We know this because three dimensional matter is seen in the sixth dimension with galaxy formations. This (sixth dimension) is the extent our consciousness is aware.
ii. Our consciousness is moving to the sixth, once we are aware of the fifth dimension, by definition, we must be in the sixth to experience the awareness.
7. Every octave of dimensions is contained in a singularity.
8. Energy is a product of the pressure dimensions apply to each other.
a. All pressure is derived from surrounding dimensions and all dimensions are pressurized.
b. Energy is seen as the life cycle of all matter inside of dimensions.
9. All the matter we see is contained in all of the dimensions at all times.
a. Because time is our observation window into the Universe, we have a perspective unique to the dimension we occupy in the singularity.
10. Everything is connected and the spiritualists are correct. It may be magic to us, but it is real.
Sunday, September 28, 2014
Friday, September 5, 2014
TIME (TRAVEL) IS ON MY SIDE
Let’s cut to the chase here, at least part of the chase anyway. What does this theory say about time travel? Well, those who keep up with the blog, videos and book, know that I emphatically put forth it is impossible to time travel. But, I always add; with our three dimensional bodies it is impossible, it is not impossible for our consciousness to time travel.
So, according to this theory, time (as we think of it) does not exist. If this is true, and we live within a continuous instant, the past and future do not exist and therefore are not accessible to us. But, since we experience our three dimensional self from the fourth dimension, then we should be able to (or do) experience ourselves from the fifth and sixth dimensions as well. If we can do this, and become aware from the sixth dimension, then, to us the fourth dimension would become a point with no such thing as time; therefore, you would see it’s totality in an instant from the sixth dimension perspective. This means it would contain all of the past within it as well, but I cannot be certain that our future is there. Because of this, I lean towards the future not being part of the instant (of totality) seen from the sixth dimension perspective, but I do think the point would contain all of the past. In support of this logic, I would think if something is experiencing itself, then it is more likely it cannot know the future; otherwise the experience would have no value.
We think of ourselves as three dimensional matter experiencing time. We can all agree on that. But if we are aware of this experience because we contemplate time (fourth dimension) then we must be in the fifth dimension conscious doing it. The logic is; we are conscious of a past having taken place, and a future there for us to use as our present. If we are conscious and aware of our fourth dimension by contemplating the affects; then we must be observing from the fifth. We must be outside of the fourth dimension in order to have this perspective. It is quite possible we are fifth dimensional entities because of this particular level of awareness.
This is where I deduce expanding dimensions containing each other. Think about this experiment for a moment; if you were inside of a point, it would be impossible to be aware that you are part of this point; until you left the inside of that point and viewed it from the outside. You are in essence willing yourself out of that dimension and into the one that contains it, or at least somehow gaining perspective from it, in order to be aware of it. If we know we are 3D objects, and we can see our 4D for how it influences and contains our life cycle, then we must be viewing this consciously from the fifth dimension.
We are aware of time, more so than the animals around us. We know the fourth dimension gives us time to live as a result of its containment of the third. We know there has been a past; we place value on it, we try to record it for the future we constantly talk about. This is what separates us from the other animals. We contemplate our lives using time as the sole reference; this is what the other animals do not do. This is why we are different; we are moving (or have gone) into the fifth dimension perspective because of our awareness of the fourth due to the effects we call time.
So what does this mean for time travel? Well, it gets kind of tricky, but if we are conscious beings occupying more than one dimension, then it would follow we must be part of a journey through dimensions, densities, and levels of consciousness (awareness). It would make sense right? If we see ourselves from outside of the third and fourth dimensions, then that may imply that we can journey to the sixth if we are not there already. If we can journey to the sixth, then we can see all of the time (in 4D) that has existed up to this moment, as one single instant. Then, if we go back to the fifth dimension perspective (from the sixth) to experience the fourth, theoretically, we should be able to go to any part of our history. I can’t imagine control of that is possible, but that may be because I’m a fifth dimension consciousness. Since I cannot be certain that control of where one would enter and leave this instant is impossible, I must assume that it is possible.
So we need to be conscious of the fifth dimension in order to have sixth dimension perspective, and vice versa. If you have sixth dimension perspective you should be able to access the past through travels back and forth (between fifth and sixth) by means of consciousness. According to these principals, time travel is possible through the consciousness.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
If there is no time, then we must live in an instant. How can this be true or even understood? It’s all because of perspective. If the pressure of the fourth dimension results in a product (time), then that product is seen in the fourth dimension only, and not in the fifth (containing the fourth) or the sixth containing the fifth. From those dimensions, they are not seen as time, but as an instant.
Think of it like this: there is a book and the book is suspended in the air in the middle of a room. At this moment, you are small enough to fit in the pages and you are flat like the pages and you are inside of this book living the same life you do now on earth.
The pages each have a story that has been written and have plenty of room to write more and when you are inside you cannot see an end to them or a beginning because it runs in an eternal cycle. The last page becomes the first, and every page is the last. There is no book cover because there is no room for it and of course, no need. The pages go in a complete circle being so tight you cannot see between them. Actually, you can barely tell it’s a book but if you get close enough you could see that there are pages (planes) and there are an infinite number of them. The closer you get the more pages there are. You can never get close enough to see one page. But of course, you don’t even know it’s a book because you are inside of it. You have no idea what it is because the border of the book is the extent of your vision.
But you don’t like being in the book and you want to leave. You desire to be outside of the book and see it for what it really is. This will prove hard because you see no border to the book, no way out, the pages go on forever, there is no beginning or end, and no escape. So you must imagine very hard and mentally take yourself outside of the book so you can see the border. You cannot go there, but you can imagine going there, and that’s good enough to get there. Once you have done this, you have left the book and instantly arrive at a perspective where the book is seen as a point in the distance, because you are so far away. At this moment you can never get closer to the point or further from it. No matter which direction you go, the point stays the same size and occupies the same spot in your field of vision.
Now, because you are outside of the book, and can no longer see the pages, everything in it does not exist to you because you can never be close enough to see it as anything but a point. It will always be a point and will always keep its secret of time. It will never reveal to you it is more than just a point but divided into infinite experiences squeezed and held in by the pages. This secret is reserved for only those that are inside of it and experience it. To something outside, it will experience none of these infinite instances going on inside, but rather one instance (point) as seen from the outside.
This is why I say time is not a dimension. It is the result of a dimension for us to experience.
Saturday, August 30, 2014
Space/Time in a Bottle
I set out to understand why time is the fourth dimension. Why is it different? We consider the first 3 dimensions as defining matter and space, but then make time the fourth. This is because we are trying to solve a problem we do not understand. We have nowhere else to go, so we say the fourth dimension gives us “time”. The fourth dimension does give us time, just like the pressure of a train blows the whistle, but remember it gives us time, it’s not time. This is the difference. We are defining a dimension by its product. We do not call the 3rd dimension matter, do we? No, we do not, because matter is created by the 3rd dimension, it is the product of the 3rd dimension.
The same is true for time. Just like we see matter as a product of the 3rd dimension, we also see time as the product of the 4th dimension. But this is only for us, and we decide how to measure it, just like we decide how to measure matter. The measurement may seem obvious and intuitive, but nevertheless, it was chosen.
We need to stop defining the fourth dimension as time. It is not time and the measurement of time has nothing to do with understanding what is outside of our solar system.
If the fourth dimension is not time, but instead it is a container and pressure just like the previous, then it would be reasonable to think the dimensions that following, follow the same rules.
Thursday, August 28, 2014
No Time, No Gravity, No Beginning, No End.
Each one of these words defines a concept that prevents us from understanding reality. Indeed, as the title would imply; I firmly believe none of these things even exist. I believe that in reality, they cannot, for if they did, we would not exist at this moment.
If you want to go on this journey with me, the only way to get something from it is to try and let go of everything you know about those four concepts. Just completely open you mind as much as you can and do not try to rationalize everything you read here with what you already know or believe. Try to let it go, and let it be, for only a moment. If you are not willing to do that, then you have already rejected it.
We should start with the simple ones first; Beginning and End. It is not possible that our solar system, galaxy, and most especially our universe, have an end, or a beginning. This would imply a state of nothingness at some point, and there is no such thing as total nothingness. We know this because if there were, then we would not exist. This is pretty simple, right?
If the universe we see now exists (and we know it does), it can be implied that it always has, because if not, we cannot explain where it was before the beginning. If you define a beginning, you are implying; that at some point, there was a state of only nothingness. But this cannot be true according to the laws of physics we used today. The conservation of energy prohibits any physical matter from being destroyed. If this is true, then it could not have been created; it must have always existed. If something cannot be destroyed, then it cannot be created either. There cannot be one without the other. There must be something to be destroyed or not be destroyed. Again, something and nothing cannot exist without each other. Only something that was never created cannot be destroyed. Indeed, we were never created and can never be destroyed.
Just think about it. How can there have ever been a state of total nothingness when we know something exists at this very instant? The fact that we exist is evidence enough that there cannot have been a beginning or end, since there must always been something, to define nothing. We can’t have started at any point because that would imply something came from nothing at some point. We must have always existed which means, we always will.
What we see are cycles. We are in view of several cycles of a living organism that is the infinite conscious. I do not want to discuss this particular notion at this particular juncture because it’s not my focus at the moment.
More important is how I arrived here through deduction along with mechanical predictability. It is mechanically predictable that we should not have a beginning or end. These concepts have no value to us, even if we were to somehow define a part of the cycle and assign it the identification of beginning or end.
This concept of beginning and end is our interpretation of something we simply cannot understand or rationalize. It is very difficult for us to let go of these concepts. We hold on to them because we need them. We need these concepts to rationalize the world around us and to negotiate what we see, as it relates to why we see things dying and being born to continue time. The 3D matter here on earth has its own unique cycle just like the stars and groups of stars. All of the cycles are the same in a sense, but we will see our cycle differently here in the fourth dimension, because it’s from this one, we observe ourselves.
Another way to know is; there has always been something, because you cannot define nothingness without it, so therefore there was never a beginning. If we choose to look for one, then we will certainly find something, but it really isn’t needed. So we should ask ourselves, what value does this add if we define a beginning? To me it is self-evident that this discovery adds nothing to our understanding. So what should it benefit us to continue pursuit of this? Have we created a subject to study that may have no relevance and may even be acting as a substitute for real knowledge?
I would suggest that this is the case. We should not be looking for a beginning to what we see; instead, we should be looking for what we know cannot be seen. Even though we cannot see it, we know it is responsible for what we do see, and therefore we can know much about it.
Next, how can there be no such thing as Time? Well, let’s be clear. What we think of as time absolutely exists because we invented it and we defined it, but it’s not really responsible for the effects on our 3D bodies like we think. This is from the pressure of the fourth dimension. I call time the fourth dimension just like everyone else, but it’s not. Time is not the fourth dimension, but rather the effects that we observe experiencing the third. The fourth dimension is pressure, the same as all others. Each dimension is a container for another and contained by another, forever, and it has nothing to do with our notion of time. We do experience time, but our measurement of it adds nothing to the study of our physical world outside of this planet and solar system. At least, not as it is being applied currently. And our measure of time is most certainly not the definition of a dimension.
We use time to measure our lives. Without it, we will have just “existed” and we cannot accept this as a complete answer for things. But in reality, it’s true. I submit to you that because there is no beginning or end, there is no time. It is only relevant to the observer at that particular instant, in response to a particular problem. We live in a continuous instant without a beginning or end and without what we think of as time. But we are fickly creatures and we want to organize things, so we use time to do this.
Unfortunately, this measurement adds nothing to our understanding of the physical world. To know that we are instead; contained, by the fourth dimension, would allow us to ignore our current understanding of time. Our concept of time is only relevant to us in our solar system. Once we discuss beyond, the concept of time must be removed from the equation.
I understand how hard this would be to accept, everything we do has time connected to it. Time is so interwoven into our thinking, this concept I present can only be understood by pushing everything from your mind you already know and believe. It should not be lost on us how our most important attribute is found on our gravestone as the amount of time we were here. It is the information we feel most pertinent to leave behind. We have the date we were born, when we died, and how many times around the Sun we made it. This is all for us, we invented it. It is our measurement. Saying time exists is like saying 12” exists. It is true that 12” may seem to exist, but in reality, it is just used to compare the size of things and give us a tool for negotiating our physical world. The 12” is a just a tool for reference, just like time.
It was Fibonacci all along. I knew there was a force holding us together. I knew there was a reason we do not explode with all of our atoms separating from each other with infinite speed. There had to be a pressure, a force, a dimension.
If we live inside another dimension, then we should see the result of this dimension. Instead, what if we use everything we see, as the result of this dimension? If we can, then we will learn something about it, and that something is; we are contained by it. Everything is contained.
We live in this containment and push through as we grow with direction inside of it. The energy we see as a result of the pressure is time, but time is not the pressure, it is a specific function we measure. What you think of as time is really just the result of a force holding together 3D matter and containing its life cycle. Everything we see as 3D matter living in 4D space follows this rule. All 3D matter moves through time, we grow through it as a helix defined by the Fibonacci sequence. Plants and animals travel through it this way, and so does our sun and solar system. The fifth dimension can somehow be measured with this information.
If our fourth dimension is flat, as we see with our solar system, then we can deduce the force creating this is planer. A helix moves through planer forces. A drill cuts through wood or metal. A hurricane is pressure above and below (planer). The same is true for our solar system. The pressure is above and below. It is these pressures that cause the rotation of planets and moons and all other debris. It is creating a cutting pattern through the fifth dimension using a helical motion. When you combine the movement of the sun in a wave pattern for its orbit around the center of our galaxy, along with the rotation of planets around it, it would result as a helix described by Fibonacci and seen everywhere else in nature.
Plants and animals cut through the 4th dimension with a Fibonacci helix, our solar system cuts through the 5th dimension with a Fibonacci helix, galaxies cut through the 6th dimension with a Fibonacci helix and our universe is cutting through the 7th dimension with a Fibonacci helix. There is no way for use to see this helix because it is the singularity. We would have to be in the 8th dimension to see this and that is not possible given our view from earth.
If planer forces influence our solar system and are responsible for the motion then it is my contention there is no such thing as gravity as we know it. At least not the (G) constant we use for celestial bodies. Now, of course there is gravity on earth. But is it really gravity? If our solar system is fueled by planer forces as the potential energy, and not a magical attraction by mass, then maybe there is a motion causing the force of gravity on earth. Then maybe it’s not necessarily a magical force of attraction that we call (g) constant. Maybe that constant is centrifugal force from the orbit of our earth? What if we were in essence walking on the inside wall of a centrifuge when we walk on the earth?
Again, I would submit this is more mechanically predictable then a magical attraction based on mass. I contend there is no big (G) and no little (g) as the result of two objects with mass attracted to each other like we think. The little (g) constant has been empirically proven but its source has not. It is just as plausible (or more so) that what we think of as gravity is actually centrifugal force of the earth being part of the centrifuge wall of rotation that created it.
This is what we see. We do not see attraction, we see motion. We see a centrifuge. How is it we cannot admit it? Instead of using what we can see here on earth and knowing its mechanical predictability, we choose to invent a magical force of attraction, but I’m not 100% sure why.
There you have it. No time, no gravity, no beginning and no end. These are the concepts that keep us from understanding our world. We have used them since our earliest memories; we couldn’t imagine life without them. Since we began to contemplate we have used these concepts without question, and quite possibly before.